Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maggie S's avatar

I agree.

I did see the company that made Meghan’s pinky ring (she wore it when she was shshing the kids at the window) merching the ring. It was ok to merch the ring but the company had pictures of the children ‘in’ the ad/post. Considering that the Sussex’s are so sensitive about releasing photos of their own kids, I was in agreement (with many) that this company shouldn’t use someone else’s kids in their merching.

Expand full comment
Cindy's avatar

I completely agree. Also your statement "Their platform is continuing to be “influencers” based upon the notoriety they both garnered as senior members of the British Royal Family." - is a spot on categorization of who they truly are now. And while there is nothing wrong with that, its their failure to recognize their own hypocrisy of using their royal title to move back and forth from royal to 'celeb/influencer' status as it benefits them. They chose a lane and they should stay in it, even though they were allowed to move to that lane on the coattails of their royal status. It's a conundrum for sure, because they couldn't have the one without having the other, but I think they thought too highly of their own star power and didn't realize it's the royal status that has the staying power.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts